Here are some (not necessarily) frequently asked questions and answers about (R)MRS.

Q Are MRS predicates fixed arity?

A Yes. This is required to make the models logically well-formed.

Q Are MRSs feature structures?

A No. Any hierarchies of predicates are also not type hierarchies. The suggested term is predicate hierarhcy, with the higher elements called “subsumers” and lower elements “subsumed”.

Q What are the elements in hcons: qeq, lheq, and outscopes.

A They are:

• qeq - equality modulo quantifiers. A qeq constraint always relates a hole to a label. The intuition is that if a handle argument h is qeq to some label l, either that argument must be directly filled by l (i.e., h=l), or else one or more quantifiers ‘float in’ between h and l.

  lheq - label-handle equality. The label and handle are constrained to be equated. Explicit equalities are used in various papers - the option of working with them rather than making the variables the same is useful theoretically and sometimes practically.

  outscopes - directly or indirectly takes scope over. This is the relationship used by most work on underspecification. mentioned as an option in the MRS paper. Two possible versions: a) hole outscopes label - like qeq with no restriction to quantifiers b) label1 outscopes label2 - label1 must dominate label2 in all scope-resolved solutions. Not currently supported by the LKB scoping code in either case.

Q what kid of variables are there?

A:

u := top.
i := u.
p := u.
h := p.

e := i & 
[ TENSE tense, MOOD mood, 
  PERF luk, PROG luk, SF sforce ].

x := i & p & 
[ PERS person, NUM number,
  GEND gender, 
  IND bool, DIV bool,
  PRONTYPE prontype ].

;;;
;;; to check for `arity' in MTRs, sometimes we need an `anti-'variable type
;;;
a := u.

Last update: 2013-04-28 by GlennSlayden [edit]